Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit on capital goods shifted from one factory to another unit of the same manufacturer was admissible, despite non-payment of full duty on removal and only partial reversal of the credit originally taken.
Analysis: The capital goods were first received in one factory and 50% Modvat credit was taken. On removal to another factory of the same manufacturer, only the earlier availed 50% credit was reversed, although full duty ought to have been paid on removal under Rule 57AB(1)(b). The remaining 50% credit was later taken in the transferee unit. The credit was held admissible because the capital goods continued to remain in the use of the same manufacturer, satisfying the condition under Rule 57AC(2)(b). The appellate authority's view was also sustained because no excess credit beyond the duty paid was taken.
Conclusion: The credit was held admissible and the Department's appeal was rejected.