Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of duty paid on an enhanced price, which was not recovered from the buyer and was in excess of the price approved by the Department under the price-list procedure, was admissible under section 11B.
Analysis: The price declared by the assessee had been approved under Rule 173C of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules. Duty was nevertheless paid on a higher self-enhanced price, but the consignee refused to pay the increased amount. In these circumstances, the incidence of the extra duty was not passed on to the buyer. Since the duty had been paid on a value different from the approved assessable value, the claim was for refund of excess duty paid beyond the approved price. Such a claim satisfied the requirements of section 11B.
Conclusion: The refund was held to be admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.