Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital goods used in the assessee's limestone mines situated outside the factory were eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The limestone excavation area was physically separated from the cement factory and no manufacturing activity was carried on there. The settled position applied by the Tribunal was that Rule 57Q required the capital goods to be used within the factory of production of the final product. The Court relied on the Supreme Court's view that excavation of limestone at an off-factory mine does not qualify for capital goods credit and that such a mine is not part of the factory for the purpose of Rule 57Q.
Conclusion: Capital goods used in the mining area were not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The appeals challenging denial of credit on mining-area capital goods failed, while the matter relating to structurals used in the factory was sent back for fresh consideration.
Ratio Decidendi: Capital goods used for excavation of limestone in an off-factory mine are not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because the mine is not the factory of production and no manufacturing activity is carried on there.