TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Commissioner's Appeal Orders set aside and matter remanded for reconsideration based on Tribunal decision. Reassessment directed for correct facts.</h1> The Tribunal set aside the Orders-in-Appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the matter for reconsideration based on a previous Tribunal ... Appeal to Appellate Tribunal - Res Judicata Issues:Appeal against refund claims for reclassification of products and excess duty paid. Appeal against Orders-in-Appeal by Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal's decision. Maintaining the correctness of facts and reconsideration of the issue.Analysis:The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue against Orders-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Ahmedabad. The appeals were related to refund claims filed by M/s. Promact Plastics Ltd. for reclassification of HDPE tapes and sacks made from such tapes. The Assistant Commissioner calculated the Modvat credit available to the appellants and the duty paid on HDPE tapes. It was found that an excess amount was refundable to M/s. Promact Plastics Pvt. Ltd. The department appealed these orders, and the Commissioner (Appeals) directed a recalculation of the refund. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, leading to the current appeal by the Revenue against the Orders-in-Appeal.The present appeal challenges the Orders-in-Appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 14-7-99. It was noted that the Commissioner had already decided appeals against similar Orders-in-Original in a previous order dated 12-6-97. The Tribunal had also finalized appeals against these decisions. The Revenue's appeal was deemed not maintainable as the issue had already been decided by the Commissioner and the Tribunal. The circumstances of the second set of appeals filed by the department, despite prior decisions, were questioned.The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the matter back to reconsider the issue in light of the Tribunal's decision. The directive was to find out the correct facts and reassess the issue based on the previous Tribunal's decision. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly on 3-6-2005.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
