Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in a valuation dispute involving sale of goods to a related concern under the old valuation regime.
Analysis: The dispute related to valuation for the period governed by the old Section 4 and the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975. The goods were sold both to a sister concern and to unrelated buyers, and the Department sought to adopt the price charged to unrelated buyers for clearances to the related concern. The order noted that the buyer and seller were related, that the comparable prices to independent buyers could be relevant for valuation, and that the appellant had not demonstrated a strong prima facie case. The order also recorded that the plea on limitation and the other valuation-related adjustments could be examined at the appeal stage.
Conclusion: The applicant was not entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit; a deposit of Rs. 8 lakhs was directed, with the balance duty and entire penalty waived and recovery stayed upon compliance.