Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be availed on the basis of a courier document not specified as a prescribed duty-paying document.
Analysis: Sub-rule (3) of Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 required that credit be taken only when inputs were received under cover of documents specified in the rule. For imported goods, the recognised duty-paying documents were those expressly enumerated, such as the duplicate copy of the bill of entry and other specified certificates or invoices. A courier document was not among the prescribed documents. Since the requisite specified document was not produced, the credit claim could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the courier document was not admissible and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit under Rule 57G could be availed only on the strength of documents expressly prescribed as duty-paying documents, and a document not so specified cannot support Modvat credit.