Modvat credit on factory light fittings denied as capital goods; waiver of pre-deposit refused for lack of hardship plea.

Entitlement to waiver of pre-deposit turned on whether flame proof glass light fittings used for factory illumination could be treated as machinery, equipment or capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On a prima facie review of competing Tribunal views, the CESTAT preferred the view that such light fittings did not qualify as eligible capital goods for credit. The absence of any plea of financial hardship also weighed against relief. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore refused, and the appellant was directed to deposit the disputed amount within four weeks.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of Modvat credit denied on flame proof glass light fittings under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The claim for waiver was examined on a prima facie basis in the light of competing Tribunal decisions on whether light fittings used for illuminating a factory could be treated as machinery, equipment, or capital goods eligible for credit. The Tribunal preferred the view that such light fittings did not qualify as eligible capital goods under the rule and also noted the absence of any plea of financial hardship.

Conclusion: The appellant was not granted waiver of pre-deposit and was directed to pre-deposit the disputed amount within four weeks.

---