Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed duty and penalty pending appeal.
Analysis: The dispute concerned applicability of Rule 57CC to bagasse, treated by the appellant as a by-product cleared without duty. The Tribunal noted that an earlier decision holding that no demand could be raised under Rule 57CC for clearance of bagasse had been carried in appeal to the Supreme Court and the appeal had been dismissed. In view of that position and the fact that the contrary High Court decision cited by the Revenue did not consider the precise issue now raised, the appellant was found to have a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: Waiver of the entire pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted in favour of the appellant.