Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for clearance of an ambulance built on a duty-paid chassis before insertion of Note 4 in Chapter 87, the value of the chassis was includible in the assessable value and the assessee was liable to duty on the entire vehicle.
Analysis: The activity of building a body on a duty-paid chassis did not amount to manufacture during the relevant period, as the deeming provision treating such activity as manufacture came into force only later. In the circumstances, the assessee was liable only on the value of the body built on the chassis. The exemption claimed in respect of the chassis under Notification No. 241/86-C.E. supported this position, and the Board's circular, read with the Supreme Court ruling relied upon, confirmed that the pre-amendment period was governed by that understanding. The lower authorities were therefore not correct in including the chassis value in the assessable value.
Conclusion: The value of the chassis was not includible in the assessable value, and the demand and penalty were unsustainable. The appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.