Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rubber gloves used by factory workers in the manufacture of chewing gum and confectionary items qualified as inputs for availment of Modvat credit under Rule 57A.
Analysis: The entitlement to Modvat credit depended on whether the goods in question had a real relation to the manufacture of the final product. Rubber gloves were held to have no role in or relation to the manufacture of chewing gum and confectionary items. The manufacture of such products was neither of a sensitive or corrosive nature requiring hand protection nor commercially inexpedient without the use of gloves. The authorities relied on by the assessee were distinguished because they involved sensitive or hazardous manufacturing processes and did not govern the present facts.
Conclusion: Rubber gloves were not inputs within the meaning of Rule 57A and Modvat credit was not admissible; the disallowance of credit and imposition of penalty were restored in favour of the Revenue.