1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Granted, File Retained, Commissioner to Review Promptly</h1> The Bench allowed the retention of the file based on a Public Notice, condoned a 26-day delay in filing the appeal due to legal ambiguity, and remanded ... Appeal - Restoration of Issues:1. Retention of file in the Bench based on Public Notice.2. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.3. Remand of the matter to the Commissioner for consideration on merits.Issue 1: Retention of file in the Bench based on Public NoticeThe appellant requested retention of the file in the Bench citing Public Notice No. 01/2001. The Bench allowed the application as the appellant's Head Office was within its jurisdiction. This decision was made to ensure the convenience of the parties involved and to adhere to the guidelines set forth in the Public Notice.Issue 2: Condonation of delay in filing the appealThe appellant filed a misc. application for early hearing of the appeal, seeking condonation of a 26-day delay. The delay was attributed to uncertainty regarding filing an appeal or a separate refund application due to legal ambiguity. The appellant argued that the delay should be condoned as the Commissioner had the authority to do so. The Bench, after careful consideration, accepted the reasons provided by the appellant for the delay. It was noted that the Commissioner had the power to condone a delay of up to 30 days after the initial 60 days. Consequently, the delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a decision on merits.Issue 3: Remand of the matter to the Commissioner for consideration on meritsFollowing the acceptance of the explanation for the delay and the decision to condone it, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) in Chennai for a fresh consideration on merits. The Bench emphasized that the Commissioner should handle the appeal expeditiously and in accordance with the Principles of Natural Justice. The Commissioner was directed to dispose of the appeal within four months from the receipt of the order, ensuring a fair and timely resolution of the case.In conclusion, the judgment addressed the issues of file retention, condonation of delay, and remand for consideration on merits, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles throughout the decision-making process.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
