Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was admissible on an electrostatic hydraulic oil cleaner used as pollution control equipment and as a spare to an electrostatic precipitator.
Analysis: The equipment was used for pollution control, but the decisive question was whether such use could still be treated as part of the manufacturing process for the purpose of capital goods credit. The reasoning denying credit solely because the equipment served pollution control was held unsustainable. The treatment of effluents and removal of waste materials were treated as integral to manufacture, and the same principle was applied to the subject equipment used in relation to pollution control.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the subject equipment, and the denial of credit was not sustainable.