Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exemption from additional excise duty on unbranded chewing tobacco continued during the relevant period after the notification granting basic excise exemption was superseded and replaced.
Analysis: The exemption from additional excise duty was granted under Notification No. 9/96, which remained in force during the relevant period and did not delete the entry for unbranded chewing tobacco. The reference in that entry to the basic duty exemption notification was treated as descriptive of the goods and their existing exemption from basic excise duty. When the earlier basic duty notification was superseded, the substituted notification continued the same exemption, so the condition underlying the additional duty exemption remained satisfied. The principle governing references to repealed and re-enacted provisions was applied, so the continued reference in Notification No. 9/96 was construed as a reference to the substituted notification. A construction that made the exemption ineffective was rejected.
Conclusion: The exemption from additional excise duty remained available for the relevant period and the demand could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification refers to another notification only as a descriptive or incorporated reference, and the latter is repealed and replaced without changing the substance of the exemption, the reference is construed as referring to the substituted notification unless a contrary intention is shown.