Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for full waiver of pre-deposit and stay in respect of the demand.
Analysis: The input furnace oil was stated to have been used for generation of electricity consumed in the manufacture of the dutiable final product, namely yarn. The order treated this as supporting credit eligibility. It further noted that the scheme permitted sending inputs out of the factory under Rule 4(5)(a), with credit not being denied so long as the products were brought back and used in the factory of production. The order also observed that credit could not be denied merely because the furnace oil was not first received in the factory and that the position was not confined by the erstwhile Rule 57J requirement of intermediate goods falling only under a Central Excise chapter heading.
Conclusion: A strong prima facie case was found and full waiver of pre-deposit and stay were granted in favour of the appellant.