Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether asbestos yarn and texti-packing used for wrapping pipelines carrying gases qualify as inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A.
Analysis: The goods were not directly incorporated in the final product, but were used for wrapping pipelines used in the manufacturing process so that the pipelines would function safely under high-pressure gas flow. Such use amounted to indirect participation in manufacture and brought the goods within the expression "used in or in relation to the manufacture" for the purpose of Modvat credit. The view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals) was consistent with the Larger Bench ratio and the supporting decisions relied upon.
Conclusion: The credit on asbestos yarn and texti-packing as inputs was held admissible, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order allowing Modvat credit on the disputed goods was sustained, with the Revenue's challenge failing on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used indirectly in the manufacturing process, and not necessarily forming part of the finished product, qualify as inputs for Modvat credit if they are used in relation to manufacture.