Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods described as flock printed fabrics were prima facie classifiable under Heading 59.07, and whether, on that footing, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of Note 5(c) to Chapter 59. The applicants contended that the fabrics, having designs produced by the flocking process, were excluded from Heading 59.07. The Tribunal found, prima facie, that the Commissioner had not properly examined the applicability of Note 5 to the fabrics, and that the material placed before it indicated that the goods were covered by Note 5(c). On that prima facie view, the goods could not fall under Heading 59.07 for the present purpose.
Conclusion: The applicants were granted waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the material shows a prima facie case that the goods fall within an excluding note to the tariff chapter, pre-deposit of duty and penalty may be waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.