1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal sets aside rejection of CHA license renewal due to pending revocation notice.</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order rejecting the renewal of the Customs House Agent (CHA) license. The decision was ... Customs House Agentβs Licence - Renewal of Issues:Renewal of Customs House Agent (CHA) license based on alleged misconduct.Analysis:The case involves the appellants, who are Customs House Agents, seeking renewal of their CHA license which expired on 14-3-2004. The Commissioner rejected their renewal application on the grounds of misconduct. However, it was noted that a show cause notice (SCN) had been issued to the CHA for revoking their license, and this matter was pending before the Commissioner for adjudication. The Tribunal found that the question of whether the CHA had failed to fulfill their obligations under the CHA Licensing Regulations was still to be decided by the Commissioner in the pending case.Upon careful consideration of the submissions from both sides, the Tribunal concluded that the CHA license should not be rejected until the Commissioner passes a final order in the adjudication of the pending SCN related to the revocation of the license. The impugned order for non-renewal of the license was solely based on misconduct, with no other grounds provided for rejecting the renewal application. Since the alleged misconduct was part of the subject-matter of the pending SCN, it was deemed premature for the Commissioner to decline renewal based on misconduct before the final outcome of the adjudication process. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.In the final decision, the Tribunal pronounced that the appeal stands allowed, indicating that the appellants were successful in challenging the rejection of their renewal application. The operative part of the order was announced in open court on 10-8-2005, marking the conclusion of the legal proceedings in this case.