Burden of proof and cross-examination in duty demand cases led to remand for fresh adjudication.

In proceedings based on enquiries, transport statements and seized records, the tribunal held that the departmental case carried a serious burden of proof and that the adjudicating authority had not properly dealt with the appellants' specific pleas. It emphasised that material evidence must be verified through witness examination and, where necessary, questions in the nature of cross-examination in the appellants' presence before credibility is accepted and liability is fixed. The adjudication was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for de novo decision.

---

---

Issues: Whether the adjudication could be sustained without properly testing the departmental evidence and the appellants were entitled to a remand for de novo decision.

Analysis: The appeal arose from duty demand and penalties imposed on the basis of enquiries, statements of transport personnel, and seized records. The Tribunal found that the departmental case carried a serious burden of proof and that the adjudicating authority had not dealt with the specific pleas in the manner required of a quasi-judicial authority. It held that the material evidence required proper verification and that the truth of the statements and documents should be tested by summoning witnesses and, if necessary, by questions in the nature of cross-examination, in the presence of the appellants. The credibility of the evidence had to be established before determining the charge and consequential liability.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication, and the appeal succeeded to that extent.

---