Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods, namely building management system, access control system, communication equipment, voice mail system and LCD projectors, were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 140/91-Cus. as capital goods used for development of software for export.
Analysis: The goods were found to be used in the development of software for export and to be essential for that activity. The certificate issued by the Chief Executive of the Software Technology Park Society, a Government agency, was accepted in the absence of any material to discredit it. The same issue had already been decided in an earlier Tribunal order granting the benefit of the notification for similar equipment used in software development. Following that reasoning, the goods were held to satisfy the requirements of the exemption notification.
Conclusion: The goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 140/91-Cus., and the Revenue's challenge failed.