Deferred Modvat credit and input reversal principles defeated the demand and penalty under the capital goods credit scheme.

Rule 57AC of the Modvat scheme allowed the deferred 50% credit on capital goods because the credit had already accrued earlier and only its availment was postponed; later exemption of the final product did not, on the language of the rule, defeat that entitlement. Reversal of credit on common inputs, once made on being pointed out, removed the foundation for the demand, and the related penalty could not survive. The CESTAT accordingly treated the demand and penalty as unsustainable and set aside the order.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the assessee was entitled to avail the deferred 50% credit on capital goods under Rule 57AC of the Modvat Rules when the final product became exempt; (ii) whether reversal of credit on common inputs removed the basis for the demand and penalty.

Issue (i): whether the assessee was entitled to avail the deferred 50% credit on capital goods under Rule 57AC of the Modvat Rules when the final product became exempt.

Analysis: The entitlement to the balance credit turned on the language of Rule 57AC(2). The credit had already accrued in the earlier year and only its availment was deferred by the scheme. The exemption of the final product with effect from 1-3-2001 did not justify reading into the rule a restriction that would deny the deferred credit merely because the product later became duty free.

Conclusion: The deferred 50% credit on capital goods was rightly available to the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether reversal of credit on common inputs removed the basis for the demand and penalty.

Analysis: The credit on common inputs was reversed on being pointed out. In the absence of any contrary decision supporting the demand, the reversal extinguished the basis for insisting on the disputed amount, and the consequential penalty could not survive.

Conclusion: The demand on this ground and the penalty were not sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The order was unsustainable in law and was set aside, with the appeals succeeding in full.

---