Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty on job-work manufactured yarn could be valued by invoking Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, and whether the assessable value could include the raw material supplier's profit margin on the footing that the transaction was not at arm's length.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured only on job-work basis from raw materials supplied by third parties. Rule 8 applies to captive consumption by the assessee itself, and therefore it could not be used to revalue the goods in a job-work situation. The valuation of job-work goods was governed by the principle laid down in Ujagar Prints, which continued to apply under the revised valuation regime, as also reflected in CBEC Circular No. 619/10/2002-CX. dated 19-2-2002. There was no evidence that the dealings between the job worker and the raw material suppliers were not on an arm's length basis.
Conclusion: Rule 8 could not be invoked, and the demand based on adding the supplier's profit margin was unsustainable. The valuation adopted by the assessee was accepted.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's valuation method for job-work clearances was upheld and the Revenue's contrary demand failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 applies only to captive consumption by the assessee, and job-work clearances must be valued in accordance with the settled Ujagar Prints principle unless a lack of arm's length dealing is shown.