TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court remits case to Tribunal for reevaluation on gift-tax liability, emphasizing factual basis determination.</h1> The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for reevaluation, emphasizing the need to determine the factual basis of the assets transferred ... Gift Tax Act, 1958 - 'Whether, Tribunal is right in holding that there is no gift involved in the facts of the present case?' - assessee is free to raise all contentions both regarding the exigibility to gift-tax and in regard to the quantum of liability if any before the Tribunal and in case the matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer before the said officer also. If for any reason it is found that there is a gift exigible to tax certainly it is open to the Tribunal to consider other aspects also - we decline to answer the question referred to us. We accordingly set aside the order of the Tribunal and remit the matter to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with law Issues:1. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that there is no gift involved in the transactionRs.2. Whether the transfer of assets from the company to the partnership firm is supported by considerationRs.3. Whether the gift, if any, is exempted under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax ActRs.Analysis:1. The case involved references from the Revenue based on an order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77. The Tribunal was directed to determine if there was a gift involved in the transaction. The assessee, a limited company, entered into a partnership in 1974, transferring assets to the partnership firm. The assessing authority viewed this transfer as a gift. However, the first appellate authority and the Tribunal disagreed, emphasizing that the transaction was in business interest and not a tax evasion scheme.2. The Tribunal, relying on previous court decisions, held that the transfer of assets was supported by consideration and not subject to gift-tax. The Department argued that the Tribunal's decision was incorrect and that the transfer lacked consideration. The Tribunal's decision was based on the business interest aspect of the transaction and the lack of evidence supporting a gift.3. The Tribunal and the first appellate authority found that the gift, if any, was exempted under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act. The assessee's counsel cited relevant court decisions to support their contention that the transfer was supported by consideration. The Tribunal and the first appellate authority's findings regarding the exemption were not challenged in the reference. The High Court noted that the authorities had failed to ascertain crucial facts related to the assets transferred, necessitating a fresh consideration by the Tribunal.The High Court, after considering various court precedents, concluded that the question of whether a gift was involved in the transaction needed to be reevaluated by the Tribunal. The Court highlighted the importance of determining the factual basis of the assets transferred before deciding on the gift-tax liability. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in line with legal principles and directions provided in the judgment. The Court declined to answer the specific question referred and set aside the Tribunal's order for reconsideration.The income-tax references were disposed of accordingly, with the judgment to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for further action.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
