Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was required to reverse Modvat credit attributable to DM Water used in the manufacture of steam sold to its sister concern, and whether it was liable to pay 8% of the value under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The disputed demand was not to be computed on the value of steam sold, but only to the extent of Modvat credit taken on DM Water that went into the manufacture of the steam sold to the sister concern. On the facts recorded, the liability was confined to reversal of credit relatable to the input used for the exempted clearances, and not to payment of 8% of the amount demanded by the Department. The matter was sent back to the original authority for fresh adjudication after giving a reasonable opportunity to adduce further evidence.
Conclusion: The appellant was held liable only to reverse the Modvat credit relatable to DM Water used in the steam sold to the sister concern, and was not liable to pay 8% of the duty amount under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.