Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue could deny Modvat credit by relying on a notification that was not invoked in the show cause notice.
Analysis: The denial of credit was sought to be supported by Notification No. 27/2000-C.E. (N.T.), but that notification had not been relied upon in the show cause notice. The notice had proceeded on Notification No. 6/2001-C.E. (N.T.), and the record showed that the inputs were received on duty-paid invoices, credit was taken accordingly, and the defective goods were returned after reversal of credit and payment of duty. The settled principle applied was that the Revenue cannot travel beyond the show cause notice, and a ground not raised therein cannot be used to deny the assessee credit.
Conclusion: The Revenue could not rely on a ground outside the show cause notice to deny Modvat credit, and the allowance of credit was upheld in favour of the assessee.