Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the imported consignment was shipped or despatched within the validity period of the advance licence so as to qualify for exemption. (ii) Whether the appellants were entitled to clear the goods under the alternate licence on the basis of endorsement as supporting manufacturer.
Issue (i): Whether the imported consignment was shipped or despatched within the validity period of the advance licence so as to qualify for exemption.
Analysis: The relevant test under Paragraph 19(3) of the Handbook of Procedure, Vol. I, EXIM Policy, 1997-2002 was whether the goods had been shipped/despatched before expiry of the licence. The record showed a dispute between the original bill of lading indicating goods taken for shipment on 30-6-1998 and the copy indicating shipment on board on 15-8-1998. The appellants did not produce further supporting evidence to conclusively establish shipment before 30-6-1998, and the record raised a reasonable doubt about that claim.
Conclusion: The shipment under the advance licence was not proved to have been made within the licence period, and exemption on that basis was not available.
Issue (ii): Whether the appellants were entitled to clear the goods under the alternate licence on the basis of endorsement as supporting manufacturer.
Analysis: Paragraph 7.18 of the Handbook of Procedure, Vol. I, EXIM Policy, 1997-2002 permits endorsement of a manufacturer on the licence and recognises joint and several liability of the licence holder and co-licensees. The appellants' name had been endorsed before the bill of entry was filed, and the cancellation of the earlier release advice was not controverted. The endorsed status was sufficient to permit import under the alternate licence.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to import the consignment under the alternate licence.
Final Conclusion: The denial of exemption under the first licence could not stand in view of the appellants' entitlement under the alternate licence, and the appeals succeeded in full.
Ratio Decidendi: Where shipment within the validity period of an advance licence is not satisfactorily proved, import may still be protected if the importer was validly endorsed on an alternate licence as a manufacturer entitled to import under the governing policy provisions.