Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed duty and penalty should be granted in full in respect of Modvat credit claimed on steel structures, platforms and other parts alleged to be components of capital goods.
Analysis: The order held that, prima facie, steel structures and platforms could not be treated as parts of capital goods. It was further found that, under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, only goods falling within the specified tariff heading could qualify as capital goods, and the admissibility of credit on the goods in question was an arguable issue. Since no prima facie case for complete waiver was made out, but financial hardship was pleaded, partial relief from pre-deposit was considered appropriate.
Conclusion: Full waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The assessee was directed to deposit Rs. 10,00,000 within eight weeks, and the balance duty and entire penalty were waived and recovery stayed pending the appeal.