Duty-paid input requirement under excise exemption notification defeated claim for goods made from market-purchased scrap and used rails.

Exemption under Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was available only for finished goods manufactured from duty-paid inputs. Old and used rails and scrap bought from the market and auction could not be presumed duty-paid merely because they were used as inputs; duty had to be shown as already suffered on such material. Applying the same principle as the Supreme Court's earlier ruling on the notification, the exemption claim failed and the appellant was held not entitled to the benefit.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. dated 20-5-1988 when the inputs used in manufacture consisted of old and used rails and scrap purchased from the market and auction.

Analysis: The notification granted exemption only where the finished goods were manufactured out of duty-paid inputs. The record showed that the inputs were scrap and used rails procured from open market and auction, and such material could not be presumed to be duty-paid merely because it was used as input. Scrap and waste are not automatically treated as duty-paid goods unless it is shown that excise duty had already been suffered on them. The prior decision of the Supreme Court on the same notification and similar goods supported this view.

Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of the notification, and the claim for exemption failed.

---