Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could be denied small scale exemption on the ground that it had not obtained a Central Excise licence, when the remand was confined to determining whether the exemption under Notification No. 175/86 had already been availed during the relevant earlier period and the earlier adjudication had not disturbed that availment.
Analysis: The remand order limited the inquiry to whether the assessee had in fact availed the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 and, if so, whether the benefit was available for the impugned period. The record showed that the assessee had been availing exemption from the beginning, and an earlier adjudication had imposed only a small penalty without raising any duty demand or unsettling the exemption already availed. That earlier order had attained finality. In the remand proceedings, the lower authority nevertheless denied the exemption on a new ground, namely absence of a Central Excise licence. Such a finding travelled beyond both the show cause notices and the remand directions, and it amounted to reopening a settled factual position in subsequent duty proceedings.
Conclusion: The denial of exemption on the ground of absence of Central Excise licence was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the exemption for the relevant period.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, with consequential relief to follow.
Ratio Decidendi: A finding that goes beyond the scope of the show cause notice and a limited remand order, and that seeks to unsettle a final earlier adjudication on availed exemption, cannot sustain denial of an exemption in subsequent duty proceedings.