Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 26/2000-Cus. dated 01-03-2000 could be denied for import of copper rectangular strip of Sri Lankan origin on the basis of Circular No. 73/2003-Cus. dated 13-08-2003.
Analysis: The notification granting nil customs duty on specified goods of Sri Lankan origin was in force on the date of import and was not shown to have been rescinded. The exemption depended upon proof of origin to the satisfaction of the customs authority through the prescribed certificate of origin. The circular relied upon by the department referred to concerns regarding surge in copper imports and requested Sri Lanka to stop export of copper strips and profiles, but it did not establish a statutory rescission of the notification or a specific prohibition against import of the goods in question under the notification. In the absence of evidence that the exemption had been withdrawn or that the impugned goods were excluded from its scope, denial of the benefit was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The denial of exemption was not justified and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification.
Final Conclusion: The appellate order was set aside and the import was held eligible for the customs exemption claimed.
Ratio Decidendi: A valid exemption notification cannot be denied merely on the basis of an administrative circular unless the notification is rescinded or a specific legal prohibition against the import is shown.