Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed Modvat credit could be denied under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. dated 30-08-1997 on the ground that the invoices carried the declaration of clearance under Rule 96ZP and, separately, on the ground that the manufacturer had not paid interest on delayed duty payment.
Analysis: The invoice declaration that the goods were cleared under Rule 96ZP was treated as sufficient compliance with the notification requirement, and the credit could not be denied merely for want of any further formality. As to the second ground, interest was held not to form part of duty, so non-payment of interest by the manufacturer did not disentitle the buyer from deemed credit on duty-paid inputs.
Conclusion: The denial of deemed Modvat credit was unjustified on both grounds and the assessee was entitled to the credit.