Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether front end loaders used in the factory for handling bagasse were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The equipment was used within the factory for handling bagasse, a waste product arising after manufacture of sugar, and for feeding it back into the burner for steam generation. On that functional use, the equipment fell within clause (a) of the Explanation to Rule 57Q as material handling equipment and was therefore covered by the definition of capital goods.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was not justified and the front end loaders were rightly treated as capital goods.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the order allowing Modvat credit was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Equipment used in the factory as material handling machinery for the manufacturing process can qualify as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q.