Appellate Tribunal denies stay on Commissioner's order in tax case. Evidence insufficient for clandestine clearance. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the application for stay of operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside a demand of Rs. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal denies stay on Commissioner's order in tax case. Evidence insufficient for clandestine clearance.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the application for stay of operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside a demand of Rs. 3,43,944 and Rs. 1,60,000. The Tribunal held that the evidence on record was insufficient to establish clandestine clearance. The Tribunal stated that the correctness of the Commissioner (Appeals) order can only be considered when the appeal is finally heard. The prayer for stay was denied due to lack of justification provided for granting stay.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the application for stay of operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside a demand of Rs. 3,43,944 and Rs. 1,60,000. The Tribunal held that the evidence on record was not sufficient to establish clandestine clearance. The Tribunal stated that the correctness of the Commissioner (Appeals) order can only be considered when the appeal is finally heard. The prayer for stay was denied as there was no justification provided for granting stay.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
