TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules property transfer to daughter subject to gift-tax liability; rejects maintenance settlement argument. Interest waiver denied.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Gift-Tax Versus Mrs. Johna Austin.</h3> Commissioner of Gift-Tax Versus Mrs. Johna Austin. - [2004] 265 ITR 595, 179 CTR 413, 127 TAXMANN 361 Issues:Interpretation of legal obligation of a Christian father to maintain his daughter under the Gift-tax Act, 1958. Valuation of property gifted by an assessee to her daughter and its liability to gift-tax.Analysis:The judgment pertains to a reference under section 26(1) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, regarding the legal obligation of a Christian father to maintain his daughter and the gift-tax liability of property transferred by an assessee to her daughter. The respondent-assessee gifted land to her daughter, valuing it at Rs. 1,50,000, while the assessing authority determined the taxable gift at Rs. 1,20,000. The assessee contended that the transaction was not subject to gift-tax, leading to appeals and subsequent orders. The Tribunal relied on previous decisions, prompting the Revenue to challenge the matter. The Revenue argued that the transaction was taxable based on subsequent court decisions reversing earlier rulings.The counsel for the assessee argued that the authorities did not consider the deed transferring the property to the daughter, emphasizing it was a settlement for the daughter's future maintenance of the assessee. The appellate authorities accepted the claim, citing a custom in the Christian community of giving properties to daughters at marriage for maintenance. However, the court referenced previous judgments that rejected the notion of ongoing maintenance obligations for daughters post-marriage, applicable to both Hindu and Christian fathers. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the gift-tax liability of the transferred property.The court declined to address certain limbs of the initial question due to the resolution of the third and fourth limbs in favor of the Revenue. The assessee's request to waive or reduce interest on the gift-tax liability was not granted, with the court clarifying its inability to issue such directives in an advisory capacity. The judgment was to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for further action based on the court's decision.
TaxTMI 