Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether property transferred by the assessee to her daughter at the time of marriage was not exigible to gift-tax on the basis of customary practice or alleged maintenance obligation.
Analysis: The transfer was made through a registered deed and the assessee had herself returned the value of the property for assessment. The Court relied on its earlier decisions holding that any customary practice of giving property to daughters at marriage, whether in Hindu or Christian communities, does not exclude gift-tax liability. It further held that the obligation of a Christian father or Hindu father to maintain a daughter ceases on marriage and thereafter the obligation rests elsewhere, so the transfer could not be treated as a non-taxable settlement on maintenance grounds.
Conclusion: The transfer was held liable to gift-tax and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by answering the substantive taxability question against the assessee, while declining to answer the remaining limbs as unnecessary.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer of property to a daughter at marriage does not escape gift-tax merely because it is supported by a community custom or is said to be for future maintenance after marriage.