Embroidery classification under excise tariff: Chapter Note 8 confined to fabrics, so processed embroidery escaped duty treatment.

Processed embroidery was held outside Chapter Note 8 because the note was confined to "fabrics of this Chapter," and the tariff scheme treated embroidery as a distinct product from fabric. The classification analysis distinguished fabric manufacture from decorative embroidery on an existing base fabric, supported by the separate treatment of embroidery in Heading 5805 and the HSN notes. Applying strict construction of taxing entries, any ambiguity had to be resolved in favour of the assessee. Accordingly, processed embroidery could not be treated as fabric for duty under Heading 5805 on the basis of Chapter Note 8.

---

---

Issues: Whether processed embroidery is liable to duty under Heading 5805 of Chapter 58 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 by treating embroidery as fabric for the purpose of Chapter Note 8.

Analysis: The tariff scheme distinguishes fabrics from embroidery. Chapter 58 contains separate headings for fabrics and for embroidery, and Heading 5805, at the relevant time, described embroidery as a distinct product rather than as fabric. The expression in Chapter Note 8, namely "in relation to fabrics of this Chapter", indicates a restricted application to fabrics and not to other goods of Chapter 58 that are not fabrics in common parlance. Embroidery is understood as decorative work on a pre-existing base fabric, and the tariff and HSN notes treat it as separate from fabric manufacture. In a taxing statute, any doubt in classification must be resolved strictly and in favour of the assessee.

Conclusion: Chapter Note 8 did not apply to embroidery as such, and processed embroidery was not dutiable under Heading 5805 on the footing that it was fabric.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff entry and chapter note expressly confine liability to fabrics, embroidery cannot be brought within that note unless the statute clearly treats embroidery itself as fabric; taxing entries must be construed strictly.

---