Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a prima facie view, the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay of recovery pending the appeal, having regard to the exemption notifications governing speciality oil and lubricating oil.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the demand had been confirmed on the footing that the products were obtained by straight blending of mineral oils and therefore did not satisfy the requirements of the relevant notifications. For interim relief, the Tribunal found a strong prima facie case because earlier Tribunal decisions had treated straight blending of mineral oils as amounting to blending for the purpose of the exemption entry, and lubricating oils so obtained had also been held to fall within the scope of the relevant notification.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.