1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Successful appeal overturns duty payment & penalty in tax dispute. Board's circular key in granting relief.</h1> The appeal was successful as the Order-in-Appeal upholding duty payment and penalty was overturned. The appellant's argument that pig iron was used for ... Cenvat/Modvat Issues: Appeal against Order-in-Appeal confirming duty payment and penalty.The appellant challenged the Order-in-Appeal upholding the duty payment of Rs. 4,03,201 and sustaining a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed by the adjudicating authority. The duty was demanded for pig iron allegedly used in an exempted final product, while the appellants argued that the pig iron was used only for products attracting duty. They claimed to have prepared a statement showing the tonnage of material on which credit was taken and the quantity of finished products cleared on payment of excise duty, with variations in modvat calculations. The adjudicating authority noted that the appellants had taken credit for duty paid on inputs used in scrap arising in the manufacture of exempted pumps, requiring reversal of the same.The Order-in-Appeal clarified that waste and scrap cleared on duty payment cannot be treated as clearance of finished excisable goods, leading to disallowance of credit for input quantity used in such scrap. The appellant relied on a circular by the Board stating that 'Waste and Scrap' are final products within the definition under Rule 57AA(C), which was ignored in the impugned orders. Consequently, the appeal succeeded, and relief was granted in accordance with the law.