Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a case for complete waiver of pre-deposit in a classification dispute concerning applicability of Notification No. 5/2001 to the product and the consequential determination of assessable value under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The product was prima facie found to be covered by the notification under the residuary expression "other mosquito repellents". The appellant's plea that the goods were mosquito killers and not mosquito repellents, and that the notification covered only coils and mats functioning by heating or burning, was not accepted at the interim stage. On the materials then available, no case for full waiver of pre-deposit was made out, and the matter was left for final hearing.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was refused and the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 20 lakhs under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Final Conclusion: The interim relief application was disposed of by imposing a pre-deposit condition, while the substantive classification controversy was kept open for regular hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a strong prima facie case for total waiver, an appellant in a tax matter may be directed to make pre-deposit under the statutory stay provisions.