Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was admissible on an excavator used in mining operations on the footing that the mine formed part of the factory.
Analysis: The excavator was used in mines situated contiguously to the factory, but the claim depended on treating the mine as part of the factory for the purposes of Rule 57Q. The reasoning rejected that premise, holding that a mine governed by the Mines Act cannot be treated as part of the factory under the factory law definition relied upon for Modvat eligibility. On that basis, the excavator used in the mine did not satisfy the requirement of use within the factory.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the excavator was not admissible and the claim failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For Modvat eligibility under Rule 57Q, equipment used in a mine cannot be treated as used within the factory merely because the mine is contiguous to the factory premises.