Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the disputed items used in the manufacture of aluminium products, including whether Aquagraph 77 constituted an input or was excluded as an appliance, device, or part of machinery.
Analysis: The disputed items, other than Aquagraph 77, had already been held eligible for Modvat credit in the appellants' own earlier matter, and that ratio was followed. As to Aquagraph 77, it was found to be a water-based colloidal graphite sprayed on castor rolls to prevent sticking of aluminium strips and to facilitate the casting process. It was treated as an essential consumable used in relation to manufacture and not as an appliance, device, or part of machinery excluded by the explanation to Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on all the disputed items, including Aquagraph 77.
Final Conclusion: The orders denying credit were set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief according to law.