Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in view of the definition of "inputs" and the facility of sending inputs, after partial processing, to a job worker.
Analysis: The application turned on the scope of Rule 2(f) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001, which treats as inputs goods used in or in relation to manufacture and goods used as fuel for generation of electricity or steam for manufacture of final products. The request also relied on Rule 4(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001, permitting sending of inputs as such or after partial processing to a job worker, provided the goods are received back. On these provisions, and on the admitted use of the electricity and steam in manufacture, the applicant showed a strong prima facie basis against immediate recovery.
Conclusion: The application for waiver was allowed and recovery of the duty and penalty was stayed during pendency of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory definition of inputs and the job-work provision support the applicant's case, and the processed material is used to generate electricity or steam for manufacture, a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit is made out.