SSI exemption does not waive record-keeping or delivery challan requirements; confiscation and penalty may follow, though quantum can be reduced.

An SSI unit exempt from duty remained bound to maintain private production and clearance records and to issue its own delivery challan when removing excisable goods. Failure to keep such records and removal of goods without a challan justified confiscation and penalty, because exemption from duty did not alter the excisable character of the goods. The redemption fine and penalty were, however, reduced as the unit was within the exemption limit and the original monetary burden was considered excessive. The confiscation and penalty findings were maintained, with only the quantum moderated.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether excisable goods removed by an SSI unit without a delivery challan and without maintaining private records were liable to confiscation and penalty; (ii) whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed were excessive.

Issue (i): Whether excisable goods removed by an SSI unit without a delivery challan and without maintaining private records were liable to confiscation and penalty.

Analysis: Exemption from duty did not remove the character of the goods as excisable goods. Even where central excise registration and RG-1 maintenance were not required, the unit was still bound to follow the simplified procedure by maintaining private records of production and clearances and by issuing its own delivery challan at the time of removal. Since no delivery challan had been issued and no account of goods produced and cleared had been maintained, the goods were treated as liable to confiscation and the imposition of penalty was upheld.

Conclusion: The confiscation and penalty were justified and were upheld.

Issue (ii): Whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed were excessive.

Analysis: While sustaining liability to confiscation and penalty, the order recognized that the unit was an SSI unit and remained within the exemption limit. On that footing, the original redemption fine and penalty were considered on the higher side and were reduced.

Conclusion: The redemption fine and penalty were reduced.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of reduction in monetary burden, while the findings of confiscation and penalty were otherwise maintained.

Ratio Decidendi: An SSI exemption does not exempt an excisable goods manufacturer from maintaining private records and issuing a delivery challan on removal, and failure to do so can justify confiscation and penalty, though the quantum may be moderated according to the circumstances.

---