TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Chennai rules in favor of appellants on Di-calcium Phosphate duty exemption case</h1> <h3>AADITHYA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHENNAI</h3> AADITHYA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHENNAI - 2004 (177) E.L.T. 1061 (Tri. - Chennai) Issues:1. Denial of benefit under Notification No. 6/94-C.E. for Di-calcium Phosphate.Analysis:Issue 1: Denial of benefit under Notification No. 6/94-C.E. for Di-calcium PhosphateThe appellants were denied the benefit of Notification No. 6/94-C.E. for Di-calcium Phosphate due to the absence of an End-Use Certificate, leading to a demand for differential duty. The appellants argued that the requirement of an End-Use Certificate did not apply to bulk drugs like Di-calcium Phosphate, citing a Board Circular. Upon reviewing the Circular, it was established that the End-Use Certificate was only mandatory for 'other bulk drugs' specified in the restrictive list, which did not include Di-calcium Phosphate. Therefore, the appellants were not obligated to produce the certificate for their product and were entitled to the exemption under the notification. Consequently, the demand for duty was deemed unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.This judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, clarifies the applicability of the End-Use Certificate requirement under Notification No. 6/94-C.E. for Di-calcium Phosphate. The decision emphasizes the importance of aligning the specific product with the regulatory provisions to determine eligibility for exemptions, thereby providing a clear interpretation of the law to prevent undue financial burdens on the appellants. The case underscores the significance of thorough legal analysis and adherence to regulatory guidelines to ensure fair treatment and uphold the rights of the concerned parties in matters of taxation and duty exemptions.
TaxTMI 