Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the marking "online" on the goods amounted to use of another person's brand name or trade name so as to deny the benefit of Notification No. 1/93-C.E.
Analysis: The expression "online" was found to be a technical word and not a trade-mark or brand name associated with the assessee's goods in the market. The mere fact that "Online" was also the name of a company did not establish a relevant connection between the word used on the goods and the goods manufactured by the assessee. The finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) was also supported by the cited precedent on the meaning of brand name in the exemption context.
Conclusion: The use of "online" did not amount to use of another person's brand name or trade name, and the assessee remained entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E.