Arbitration clause survives contract termination and section 8 referral becomes mandatory when statutory requirements are met.

An arbitration clause is a separable and collateral term of a valid contract, so it survives termination or breach unless the contract was void ab initio, never concluded, or wholly superseded by a later agreement. The clause covered disputes arising out of or relating to the hire purchase agreement, and termination did not extinguish that submission to arbitration. Where the statutory requirements of section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were satisfied, including a valid arbitration agreement and a timely application with the agreement produced, the judicial authority had no discretion and was bound to refer the parties to arbitration.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the arbitration agreement survives when the hire purchase contract is terminated for breach; (ii) whether the court was bound to refer the parties to arbitration under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Issue (i): Whether the arbitration agreement survives when the hire purchase contract is terminated for breach.

Analysis: An arbitration clause is a collateral and separable term of the contract. Where the parties admit the existence of a binding contract and the dispute concerns breach, termination, or consequences arising out of that contract, the arbitration clause does not perish merely because the contract has been brought to an end. The clause ceases to operate only where the contract is void ab initio, never concluded, or wholly superseded by a new agreement so as to extinguish the earlier submission to arbitration. The broad language of the clause in the present contract covered all disputes arising out of or relating to the agreement.

Conclusion: The arbitration agreement survived the termination of the hire purchase contract and remained enforceable for disputes arising under it.

Issue (ii): Whether the court was bound to refer the parties to arbitration under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Analysis: Section 8 is mandatory once the statutory requirements are met: there must be an arbitration agreement, the suit must concern the same subject matter, the application must be made before the first statement on the substance of the dispute, and the original or certified arbitration agreement must accompany the request. On the record, those conditions were satisfied, and the judicial authority had no discretion to retain the dispute once a valid arbitration clause governed it.

Conclusion: The court was bound to refer the parties to arbitration under section 8.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was referable to arbitration notwithstanding termination of the underlying contract, and the suit ought to have been stayed in favour of arbitral determination.

Ratio Decidendi: An arbitration clause, being separable and collateral to the substantive contract, survives termination or breach of a valid contract and, where the statutory conditions of section 8 are satisfied, referral to arbitration is mandatory.

---