Modvat credit cannot be denied for description mismatch when duty-paid inputs are undisputed and amended rules apply to pending cases.

Modvat credit could not be denied solely because the description of inputs in the declaration did not exactly match the description in the gate passes, where the duty-paid nature of the inputs was undisputed. The amended declaration rule under Notification No. 7/99-C.E. (N.T.) applied to pending matters, and the Larger Bench view treated that amendment as governing such cases. On that basis, the disallowance of credit was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to the claimed relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied merely because the description of the inputs in the declaration did not exactly match the description in the GPIs, and whether the amended rules applied to pending cases.

Analysis: The credit was refused only on the ground of discrepancy in description. The rules governing declarations had been amended by Notification No. 7/99-C.E. (N.T.) so that credit was not to be denied merely for non-compliance with details required in the declaration. The Tribunal's Larger Bench view in the cited precedent treated the amendment as applicable to pending matters. The duty paid nature of the inputs was not disputed.

Conclusion: Modvat credit could not be denied on the sole ground of mismatch in description, and the amended position governed the pending case.

Final Conclusion: The disallowance of credit was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to the relief claimed.

Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit cannot be denied solely for a discrepancy in description of inputs in the declaration where duty payment is undisputed and the amended declaration requirement applies to pending cases.

---