Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed Modvat credit was admissible on invoices containing the supplier's declaration that duty had been discharged under Rule 96ZP, and whether the matter required remand for fresh decision.
Analysis: Notification No. 58/97-C.E. dated 30-8-97 permitted Modvat credit on the basis of invoices containing a declaration that duty had been discharged by the input supplier. The invoices carrying such declaration could not be denied credit without examining the relevant factual and legal position. The lower appellate authority had not considered this aspect in detail and had also failed to examine the assessee's plea concerning the supplier's duty liability and the effect of the pending dispute. In such circumstances, the record required fresh consideration and the assessee had to be afforded an opportunity to lead evidence in support of the claim.
Conclusion: The denial of deemed Modvat credit was not sustained in the manner adopted by the lower authority, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after hearing the appellants.