Interest credited as "Deferred accrued interest" not taxable; no legal obligation to pay; amounts unilaterally quantified by assessee.

The court held that the amounts credited to "Deferred accrued interest" were not taxable income as they did not constitute real or accrued income. The court found that there was no legal obligation for the user-agencies to pay the interest, and the amounts were unilaterally quantified by the assessee. The appeals were allowed, and the amounts were directed to be deleted from the assessee's income for the respective assessment years. The Tribunal's decision was overturned as it incorrectly applied the concept of real income in determining the taxability of the interest amounts.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of receivable interest credited to "Deferred credit interest on overdue interest bills account" and debited to "Deferred credit interest receivable account".
2. Correct application of the concept of real income by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Taxability of Receivable Interest

The primary issue is whether the amounts credited to "Deferred credit interest on overdue interest bills account" and debited to "Deferred credit interest receivable account" constitute real income and are taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Facts:
- The assessee is a government undertaking involved in the supply of handloom inputs to various agencies.
- The assessee follows the mercantile system of accounting.
- There was no agreement between the assessee and user-agencies regarding the payment of interest on overdue bills.
- The assessee unilaterally mentioned an interest rate on the back of the bills without any acknowledgment or acceptance from the user-agencies.
- The interest amounts were credited to "Deferred accrued interest" and debited to "Deferred accrued interest receivable" at the end of the year to avoid reflecting non-existent income.

Court's Findings:
- The court held that the amounts of Rs. 1,69,14,552 and Rs. 1,97,39,358 credited in the respective assessment years do not represent real income.
- There was no legal obligation on the part of the user-agencies to pay the interest.
- The interest never became a debt due from the user-agencies to the assessee.
- The amounts were unilaterally quantified by the assessee and did not constitute accrued income.

Legal Precedents:
- The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT, which emphasized that income must be real and not hypothetical.
- The court also cited CIT v. Shoorji Vallabhdas and Co., stating that income-tax is a levy on real income, not on hypothetical or notional income.
- The court noted that the decision in State Bank of Travancore v. CIT, which was relied upon by the Tribunal, has not been treated as the correct enunciation of law in subsequent Supreme Court judgments.

Conclusion:
- The amounts credited to "Deferred accrued interest" do not constitute taxable income as they were neither real nor accrued income.
- The appeals were allowed, and the amounts were directed to be deleted from the assessee's income.

Issue 2: Correct Application of the Concept of Real Income

The second issue is whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal correctly applied the concept of real income in determining the taxability of the interest amounts.

Court's Findings:
- The Tribunal's decision was based on the grounds that the assessee kept the issue of interest alive and did not account for it as per the amended provisions of the Companies Act.
- The Tribunal's reliance on the judgment in State Bank of Travancore v. CIT was misplaced as it has not been followed in subsequent Supreme Court decisions.
- The court reiterated that income must be real and enforceable under law to be taxable, as established in various Supreme Court judgments.

Conclusion:
- The Tribunal erred in its application of the concept of real income.
- The amounts credited to "Deferred accrued interest" were not real income and thus not taxable.

Final Judgment:
- The appeals were allowed.
- The impugned order of the Tribunal was set aside.
- The amounts of Rs. 1,69,14,552 for the assessment year 1990-91 and Rs. 1,97,39,358 for the assessment year 1991-92 were directed to be deleted from the assessee's income.

---