Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the demand and penalty arising from denial of deemed credit.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted the appellants' contention that the supplier had since discharged the entire duty liability under the Compounded Levy Scheme, along with interest, and that the objection based on non-payment of appropriate duty on inputs no longer had merit. On the material placed before it, the Tribunal found a strong prima facie case against the sustainability of the demand.
Outcome: The stay application was allowed and the pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived, with stay granted on recovery during the pendency of the appeal.