Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported brass material was classifiable as brass waste and scrap under Heading 74.04 or as brass powder under Heading 74.06, and whether the order of confiscation, redemption fine and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The goods were described in the import documents as brass waste, and the evidence on record showed that they arose from grinding and manufacturing processes in brass industries. The definition of waste and scrap in Section Note 6 of Section XV covered metal waste and scrap from manufacture or mechanical working, while powder classification required the statutory test of 90% or more by weight passing through a sieve of 1 mm mesh aperture. The laboratory reports did not establish that test. The technical literature and HSN notes also showed that metal powders are specially manufactured products with distinct characteristics and uses, unlike waste and scrap merely because it appears in powdery form. The independent certificates and supplier's certificate supported the conclusion that the goods were process waste fit only for recovery of metal.
Conclusion: The goods were brass waste and scrap, not brass powder, and the confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were not sustainable.