Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether wooden laminated tops manufactured independently for use on refrigerators were classifiable as parts of refrigerators, and whether their classification as such could deny the benefit of small-scale exemption.
Analysis: The tops were manufactured separately by a carpenter and were fixed on the refrigerator only at the top. The record showed that a refrigerator remained complete and functional without such tops, and the goods had earlier been treated as articles of wood rather than refrigerator parts. On the nature of the product, the tops were more in the character of accessories than essential components. The classification approach also had to be consistent with the pre-existing exemption position, and nothing showed a legislative intention to withdraw small-scale exemption from such manufacturers merely because the goods were later sought to be treated as refrigerator parts under the new tariff structure.
Conclusion: The goods were not parts of refrigerators and the assessees were entitled to the benefit of small-scale exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: A product that is independently manufactured and is only an optional accessory, not an essential component needed for a refrigerator to be complete, cannot be classified as a part of the refrigerator so as to deny small-scale exemption.